health techhow-toconsumer advice

Custom Insoles and Your Feet: When Are High-Tech Solutions Actually Helpful?

bbestlaptop

2026-02-03

9 min read

Custom insoles can help—but only when matched to real medical need. Learn when 3D scans and DTC tech are useful, and when to see a podiatrist.

Why your feet and a flood of ‘high-tech’ insoles are a confusing buy — and how to avoid wasting money

Too many options, mixed claims, and vague tech jargon leave shoppers unsure whether to buy a $30 foam insert, a $250 3D-printed insole, or see a podiatrist. If you’ve read headlines this January about Groov’s iPhone-scanned custom insoles and felt skeptical, you’re not alone: critics called some of these products “placebo tech.” This article clears the fog: when custom insoles and 3D foot scans help, when they’re mostly marketing, and how to pick a path that actually improves comfort or health.

Bottom line up front (inverted pyramid)

Custom insoles can be highly effective for diagnosed biomechanical or medical conditions (plantar fasciitis, overpronation with pain, certain sports injuries, diabetic foot care) when prescribed with professional assessment and pressure/gait data. For general comfort, many consumers do as well with quality off-the-shelf insoles. Smartphone 3D scans and DTC (direct-to-consumer) custom insoles are improving in 2026 but often lack the dynamic measurement clinicians use — so treat them as convenience-driven, not a universal medical substitute.

What changed in 2025–2026: the tech and the backlash

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw a surge of companies leaning on smartphone photogrammetry and consumer 3D scans to make bespoke insoles. Many products now combine:

smartphone 3D foot scans (photogrammetry or phone LiDAR),
AI models that predict arch and pressure zones,
3D printing for custom midsoles and shells, and
in-shoe sensors or pressure mats for gait data (still less common).

Reviewers and clinicians pushed back in 2025–26. High-profile reviews (including a Jan 2026 piece in The Verge about Groov) flagged the gap between attractive marketing and clinical effect — leading to more consumer skepticism and calls for clearer evidence.

“This 3D-scanned insole is another example of placebo tech,” wrote The Verge’s reviewer in January 2026 after a hands-on session with a smartphone-scanned insole.

Medical orthotics vs. consumer gadgetry: the key differences

Medical orthotics (what podiatrists prescribe)

Usually follow a full clinical exam and gait analysis.
Involve pressure-mapping, dynamic gait labs, or clinical casting.
Prescribed for specific diagnoses: chronic plantar fasciitis, structural deformities, neuropathy management (especially diabetic), post-injury biomechanics.
Made from durable, medical-grade materials and often more rigid—designed to control motion and redistribute pressure.
May be covered (fully or partially) by insurance or Medicare if medically necessary and properly documented.

Direct-to-consumer custom insoles and wellness tech

Often start with a smartphone 3D scan or an online questionnaire.
Focus on comfort, fit, and lifestyle categories (running, standing jobs, casual).
Price points range from <$100 to ~$300; marketing highlights 3D printing and personalized aesthetics.
Rarely include clinical-grade dynamic pressure testing; usually lack documentation for medical insurance claims.
Can be excellent for footwear fit and perceived comfort — but evidence of treatment-grade biomechanical correction varies.

When custom insoles are actually helpful: practical use cases

Custom insoles shine in scenarios where structural correction, pressure redistribution, or medical risk reduction is needed. Examples:

Plantar fasciitis with persistent pain: When standard conservative care (stretching, OTC insoles, NSAIDs) fails, a podiatrist-prescribed orthotic aimed at supporting the medial arch and limiting excessive pronation can reduce strain and symptoms.
Diabetic neuropathy and ulcer risk: Custom therapeutic insoles or offloading devices reduce peak plantar pressures and are a medical necessity for many patients. These need clinician oversight and clinic processes such as those described in modern clinic onboarding and micro‑makerspace playbooks.
Post-injury or chronic biomechanical issues: After ankle sprain, tendon issues, or significant gait asymmetry, a custom orthotic made from clinician data helps rehab and prevents recurrence.
High-mileage athletes with specific biomechanical goals: Runners with documented overuse injuries may benefit from athlete-grade custom orthotics that correct a measurable gait flaw.

When consumer-grade custom insoles are mostly convenience (and when that’s fine)

If your main goal is

everyday comfort, improved shoe fit, or minor soreness after long days on your feet

, a high-quality off-the-shelf or DTC custom insert often works well. These are appropriate when:

There’s no chronic pain or neurologic risk,
Symptoms respond to conservative measures,
You want a better fit for lifestyle shoes, or
You're experimenting with different levels of support before investing in medical care.

How to evaluate a custom insole company (practical checklist)

When a startup or brand promises a miracle, ask these questions before paying:

What data drives the prescription? Is it only a 3D static scan, or do they use pressure-mapping/gait analysis? Static scans miss dynamic pressure peaks.
Do they provide measurable outcomes? Ask for objective metrics such as peak plantar pressure reduction or documented improvements in validated pain scores — and look for brands that publish validation data rather than lifestyle-only marketing (data transparency and registries matter).
Is there clinician oversight? Are podiatrists or biomechanics experts involved in reviewing designs? Modern clinic workflows and remote review models are discussed in clinic operations playbooks.
What’s the trial or return policy? A meaningful trial period (30–90 days) or guarantee shows confidence and reduces risk — consider whether the company supports retail testing or pop-up demos (micro-popup commerce strategies).
Materials and durability: Know the shell and top-layer materials (EVA, TPU, carbon, medical-grade foam) and expected lifespan.
Compatibility: Will the insole fit your shoe category (running, hiking, dress)? Some 3D shells are bulky and don’t work in narrow shoes.
Cost vs. clinic options: Compare DTC price to a clinic-prescribed orthotic that may be covered by insurance.

Understanding scanning tech: what a 3D foot scan does and doesn’t do

What it does: Smartphone photogrammetry or phone LiDAR can capture foot geometry — arch height, length, width, and static shape — with improving accuracy in 2026 devices.

What it doesn’t do reliably: Dynamic peak plantar pressures and gait mechanics. That requires pressure plates, in-shoe sensors, or motion-capture gait labs. A static 3D scan can inform fit and contour but can’t repeatedly measure how load moves across your sole when you run or walk.

Case study: the Groov debate and what it teaches buyers

Groov, a startup that gained attention in early 2026 for iPhone-scanned custom insoles, illustrates the tension between convenience and clinical validity. Reviewers praised the slick onboarding and aesthetics but questioned whether a phone scan alone — absent robust pressure data or clinician review — delivers therapeutic outcomes. The conversation pushed other brands toward transparency: publishing what data they use, offering trial periods, and clarifying whether their insoles are intended for comfort or therapy. That push for clearer claims echoes broader critical-practice and review standards in 2026.

Step-by-step decision path: what you should do next

Identify your goal: Is it pain relief, medical risk reduction, sports performance, or comfort?
Try conservative care first: For most non-severe cases, try stretches, OTC cushioned insoles (4–8 weeks), and proper footwear.
Assess results: If symptoms persist or worsen, get a professional evaluation.
If you choose DTC custom: Prefer companies that combine 3D scans with pressure-mapping or clinician review, and that offer a meaningful trial/guarantee.
If you have medical risk (diabetes, neuropathy): Seek a certified clinician; don’t rely on consumer gadgets — consider clinic-based workflows and telehealth options to review sensor data remotely (clinic telehealth and onboarding).

Costs, coverage, and expectations

Typical price ranges (2026 market averages):

OTC insoles: $20–$60
DTC custom 3D-scanned insoles: $100–$300
Clinician-prescribed custom orthotics: $300–$800+ (medical-grade materials and lab work)

Insurance coverage varies. Many insurers and Medicare part B may cover therapeutic orthotics if prescribed and documented as medically necessary. Keep receipts, prescriptions, and clinician notes for reimbursement.

Red flags and marketing language to ignore

Absolute claims: “Cures plantar fasciitis” or “guaranteed to fix biomechanics” without clinical evidence.
Heavy lifestyle marketing but no clinical team or data backing.
No trial or no returns on a product that you’ll wear daily — you need time to evaluate; retailers and brands that lean on pop-up demos and field testing are often more consumer-friendly.
Celebrity endorsements being used in place of clinical validation.

Practical tips for trying insoles at home

Wear them for short periods initially (2–3 hours) and slowly increase daily wear time over 1–2 weeks.
Use the same shoe type when testing; changing shoes confounds results.
Track pain or comfort with a simple daily log (time worn, pain level 0–10, activity).
If pain increases in 1–2 weeks, stop and consult a clinician; worsening symptoms are not normal.

Future trends and predictions for 2026–2028

Expect the next wave of improvements to focus on hybrid measurement and transparency:

More DTC brands will add low-cost in-shoe sensors or pressure-mapping mats for dynamic data.
Telepodiatry and remote gait reviews (clinicians interpreting consumer scans + sensor data) will become mainstream.
Industry standards and clearer consumer labeling will emerge after 2026, as critics demand evidence-based claims.
AI will improve personalization but only when paired with objective sensor data — otherwise the risk of placebo effects remains.

When to see a clinician — clear, non-negotiable signs

Persistent or worsening foot pain after 4–8 weeks of conservative care.
Neuropathy or loss of sensation (numbness, tingling), especially with diabetes.
Open wounds, calluses with redness, or signs of skin breakdown under the foot.
Significant gait asymmetry, leg length discrepancy, or recurring stress injuries.

Expert checklist for clinicians and interested consumers

Clinicians: Demand access to raw pressure data and gait metrics when evaluating a DTC product for a patient.
Consumers: Keep a 2–4 week log, request manufacturing specs, and ask for a trial period.
Buyers: Prioritize companies that publish validation studies or at least show comparative pressure maps before/after.

Final takeaways — what to do right now

If you have medical risk (diabetes, neuropathy) or chronic pain, consult a podiatrist — don’t rely solely on a smartphone scan.
For general comfort and shoe fit, a well-reviewed OTC or DTC custom insole with a trial period is sensible and cost-effective.
When evaluating DTC custom insoles, press for dynamic data and clinician involvement — a 3D scan alone is rarely definitive.
Use conservative care first; escalate to custom orthotics only when evidence-based benefit is likely.

Call to action

Feeling unsure about your feet? Start with a 2–4 week trial of a reputable OTC insert while tracking symptoms. If pain persists, book a telepodiatry consult that reviews dynamic data and your scan — and save receipts and clinician notes in case you pursue a medically prescribed orthotic. Want unbiased buying help? Subscribe to our consumer guide for evidence-focused reviews of DTC insoles, gait sensors, and clinical orthotics; we test for real-world outcomes, not just glossy marketing.

bestlaptop

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.